Olbers’s Inverse: The all-lit problem

Speculative thoughts of Auden S. Howard


Abstract

This paper explores the astrophysical hypothesis of a hypothetical planet where every line of sight from its surface ends on a star, thus creating a sky without darkness. Through a rigorous physical and mathematical framework, this study evaluates the potential for such a phenomenon, addressing both transient and permanent stellar densities, as well as the feasibility of near-complete sky coverage. The analysis concludes with implications of the findings and proposes further questions for study.


Introduction and Hypothesis

Hypothesis: A planet may exist in the universe where, due to an exceptionally high-density stellar environment, every line of sight from its surface intersects a star, leaving no trace of observable darkness.

This concept challenges our understanding of stellar distribution and cosmic scale, compelling a deeper consideration of astrophysical limits and probabilities associated with such an extreme environment.


Physical and Mathematical Analysis

To test this hypothesis, the study examines distributions of stars, calculates sky coverage across dense cosmic environments, and assesses whether transient or permanent factors could indeed yield a zero-darkness sky.

1. Stellar Distribution and Density

Average Stellar Density in the Universe

Densest Known Stellar Regions

2. Sky Coverage Calculations

Angular Size of a Star

Fraction of Sky Covered by a Single Star

Total Sky Coverage Fraction (ff)

Example Calculation

3. Assessing Temporary Zero-Darkness Scenarios

Transient Astronomical Events

Collective Luminosity Impact

4. Exploring Near-Complete Sky Coverage

Hypothetical Extreme Environments

Perception of Brightness


Conclusion

The findings suggest that the existence of a planet where every line of sight intersects a star is improbable within the boundaries of current astrophysical understanding. Even the densest known cosmic regions show only a minimal percentage of sky coverage due to the immense distances separating stars.

Temporary events and near-complete sky coverage yield slightly more plausible scenarios but remain insufficient. Transient events are too localized to eliminate global darkness. High coverage remains physically constrained by gravitational interactions limiting extreme densities.


Further Questions

1. Could unknown cosmic phenomena or alternate physics allow such stellar densities?

Venturing beyond the Standard Model may reveal mechanisms that increase star densities or alter light propagation.

2. What would be the implications for life on a planet within an exceptionally dense stellar environment?

Exploring how such brightness affects climates, biological rhythms, and potential life adaptations may yield further insight.


References

  1. Conselice, C. J., Wilkinson, A., Duncan, K., & Mortlock, A. (2016) “The Evolution of Galaxy Number Density at z<8z < 8 and its Implications.” The Astrophysical Journal, 830(2), 83.
  1. Planck Collaboration. (2020). “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters.” Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6.
  1. Harris, W. E. (1996). “A Catalog of Parameters for Globular Clusters in the Milky Way.” The Astronomical Journal, 112, 1487.
  1. Genzel, R., Eisenhauer F., & Gillessen, S. (2010). “The Galactic Center massive black hole and nuclear star cluster.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(4), 3121.
  1. Karttunen, H., Kröger, P., Oja, H., Poutanen, M., & Donner, K. J. (2017). Fundamental Astronomy, 6th ed. Springer.
  1. Filippenko, A. V. (1997). “Optical Spectra of Supernovae.” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 35(1), 309-355.
  1. Piran, T. (2004). “The physics of gamma-ray bursts.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 76(4), 1143-1210.
  1. Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. (2008). Galactic Dynamics, 2nd ed. Princeton University Press.